Steltra
New member
Hello everyone,
I’m a researcher with a background in Data Science, and my professional focus has always been uncovering hidden patterns in complex datasets. For a long time, I’ve been fascinated by the underlying geometry of planetary cycles, which eventually led me to an experiment: stripping away the traditional planetary array to see what remains at the core.
I’ve spent the last year developing a methodology I call the "AstroPyramid." It focuses exclusively on the foundational resonance between the Sun, the Moon, the Earth, and the Individual.
The Methodology: Pure Algorithms, No AI
I want to clarify that my work involves pure, deterministic algorithms. In an era of generative AI and LLMs, I’ve chosen a different path—heavy mathematical calculations and geometric mapping. My goal is to find the "primary resonance" that exists before any other layers are added.
Full Disclosure: I was recently banned from another forum for "spamming" when I tried to share my findings. It was never my intention to promote a product; I was simply looking for professional feedback and a space for discussion. To respect the rules of this community and avoid another misunderstanding, I will not be sharing any links or names of my project here. I am strictly interested in discussing the methodology and the theory behind it.
While I cannot reveal the exact proprietary formulas (as this is my ongoing "know-how"), I can share the current results of this logic:
This is a work in progress, and the calculations are quite resource-intensive because of the astronomical precision required. I am currently busy developing a massive new module, but the core theory is ready for a peer-review-style discussion.
I’m curious to hear your thoughts: Do you think a minimalist, triad-based approach (Sun-Moon-Earth) can capture a person's "baseline" resonance more effectively than a full-planet chart? Or is the "noise" of the other planets actually essential data that cannot be filtered out?
I would love to answer any questions you have about the logic or the clusters.
Best regards,
Steltra
I’m a researcher with a background in Data Science, and my professional focus has always been uncovering hidden patterns in complex datasets. For a long time, I’ve been fascinated by the underlying geometry of planetary cycles, which eventually led me to an experiment: stripping away the traditional planetary array to see what remains at the core.
I’ve spent the last year developing a methodology I call the "AstroPyramid." It focuses exclusively on the foundational resonance between the Sun, the Moon, the Earth, and the Individual.
The Methodology: Pure Algorithms, No AI
I want to clarify that my work involves pure, deterministic algorithms. In an era of generative AI and LLMs, I’ve chosen a different path—heavy mathematical calculations and geometric mapping. My goal is to find the "primary resonance" that exists before any other layers are added.
Full Disclosure: I was recently banned from another forum for "spamming" when I tried to share my findings. It was never my intention to promote a product; I was simply looking for professional feedback and a space for discussion. To respect the rules of this community and avoid another misunderstanding, I will not be sharing any links or names of my project here. I am strictly interested in discussing the methodology and the theory behind it.
While I cannot reveal the exact proprietary formulas (as this is my ongoing "know-how"), I can share the current results of this logic:
- 24 Human Clusters: Through this geometric lens, I have identified and described 24 distinct "clusters" or archetypes of human resonance.
- Compatibility Mapping: A unique logic for calculating synergy between these profiles based on their position within the Sun-Moon-Earth triad.
- 12 Metrics of State: I’ve developed hourly state graphs that track a person’s resonance across 12 different metrics (willpower vectors, bio-rhythm indices, etc.), showing how our internal architecture fluctuates throughout the day.
This is a work in progress, and the calculations are quite resource-intensive because of the astronomical precision required. I am currently busy developing a massive new module, but the core theory is ready for a peer-review-style discussion.
I’m curious to hear your thoughts: Do you think a minimalist, triad-based approach (Sun-Moon-Earth) can capture a person's "baseline" resonance more effectively than a full-planet chart? Or is the "noise" of the other planets actually essential data that cannot be filtered out?
I would love to answer any questions you have about the logic or the clusters.
Best regards,
Steltra